最新主机优惠信息推荐
这里总有一款属于你的VPS

OLVPS-美国洛杉矶Cera GIA VPS测评报告

关于套餐

『VPS』OLVPS-512M内存/8G硬盘/512G流量/KVM/洛杉矶Cera GIA/月付39.99元

OLVPS,曾用名T667、Corecache,为EQ大佬的站点,目前上线了洛杉矶Cera GIA线路的主机,三网回程均…

基础信息

项目 数据
 CPU 型号 QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
 CPU 核心数 2
 CPU 主频 1795.672 MHz
 硬盘大小 9.3 GB (0.7 GB 已使用)
 内存大小 990 MB (299 MB 已使用)
 SWAP 交换空间大小 465 MB (0 MB 已使用)
 在线时长 0 days, 0 hour 4 min
 系统负载 0.49, 0.11, 0.04
 系统 Debian GNU/Linux 8
 架构 x86_64 (64 位)
 核心 4.9.117-0409117-generic
 虚拟化技术 kvm

磁盘IO

次数 速度
 第一次测试 232 MB/s
 第二次测试 375 MB/s
 第三次测试 429 MB/s

Unixbench测试

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
   System: debian: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux — 4.9.117-0409117-generic — #201808030631 SMP Fri Aug 3 06:34:09 UTC 2018
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
   CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   09:57:49 up 17 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.71, 0.28, 0.14; runlevel 5
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 09:57:49 – 10:25:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       21664727.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2412.8 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                                991.8 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        135474.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           34536.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        515043.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              191679.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  13398.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2753.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3424.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    943.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         219372.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21664727.2   1856.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2412.8    438.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        991.8    230.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     135474.7    342.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      34536.6    208.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     515043.3    888.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     191679.5    154.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      13398.9     33.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2753.4    218.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3424.0    807.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        943.8   1573.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     219372.6    146.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         341.3
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21664727.2   1856.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2412.8    438.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        991.8    230.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     135474.7    342.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      34536.6    208.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     515043.3    888.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     191679.5    154.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      13398.9     33.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2753.4    218.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3424.0    807.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        943.8   1573.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     219372.6    146.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         341.3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 10:25:38 – 10:53:29
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       45545570.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4847.4 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4313.8 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        372515.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           88842.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1346911.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              527089.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 143710.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              10617.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8434.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1184.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         443727.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   45545570.9   3902.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4847.4    881.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4313.8   1003.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     372515.9    940.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      88842.7    536.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1346911.0   2322.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     527089.0    423.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     143710.1    359.3
Process Creation                                126.0      10617.7    842.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8434.2   1989.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1184.5   1974.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     443727.5    295.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         958.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

双核超线程的较为不错!

带宽测试

国外网络测试

节点 IP 地址 下载速度 延迟
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 3.82MB/s 0.746 ms
Linode 日本 106.187.96.148 3.70MB/s 103.514 ms
Linode 新加坡 139.162.23.4 3.25MB/s 182.770 ms
Linode 英国 176.58.107.39 3.70MB/s 140.784 ms
Linode 法兰克福 139.162.130.8 3.71MB/s 152.387 ms
Linode 加拿大 50.116.14.9 3.86MB/s 8.766 ms
Softlayer 达拉斯 173.192.68.18 3.69MB/s 40.385 ms
Softlayer 西雅图 67.228.112.250 3.71MB/s 26.443 ms
Softlayer 法兰克福 159.122.69.4 3.25MB/s 152.330 ms
Softlayer 新加坡 119.81.28.170 3.47MB/s 223.491 ms
Softlayer 香港 119.81.130.170 3.01MB/s 179.170 ms

国内网络测试

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
———————————————————————-
Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency    
Speedtest.net    34.33 Mbit/s      31.35 Mbit/s        2.829 ms  
Fast.com         0.00 Mbit/s       32.3 Mbit/s         0.000 ms    
Shanghai  CT     33.37 Mbit/s      26.83 Mbit/s        151.195 ms
Hangzhou  CT     15.98 Mbit/s      26.03 Mbit/s        203.747 ms
Chengdu   CT     31.71 Mbit/s      26.04 Mbit/s        290.218 ms
Shanghai  CU     28.56 Mbit/s      16.12 Mbit/s        180.79 ms  
Xi’an     CU     19.71 Mbit/s      21.71 Mbit/s        341.207 ms
Chongqing CU     26.10 Mbit/s      24.01 Mbit/s        270.309 ms
Xi’an     CM     21.49 Mbit/s      27.68 Mbit/s        245.069 ms
Chengdu   CM     20.20 Mbit/s      13.96 Mbit/s        189.68 ms  
Kunming   CM     23.30 Mbit/s      24.74 Mbit/s        198.665 ms
Guangzhou CM     30.52 Mbit/s      26.31 Mbit/s        164.954 ms
———————————————————————-
未经允许不得转载:羊毛之家 » OLVPS-美国洛杉矶Cera GIA VPS测评报告
vultr 云服务器VPS送50美金

评论 抢沙发

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址